This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Billed by the fossilfuel industry as a climate solution, dozens of planned blue hydrogen projects in Europe could consume more natural gas each year than France, and produce emissions on a par with Denmark, a DeSmog analysis has found. . “You want me to admit that we have a lot of CO2 emissions because of blue [hydrogen].
These include nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which are mostly produced by the combustion of fossilfuels such as in vehicles and engines, as well as industrial processes such as power generation and cement manufacture. Typically, at Signal Group, the flows of ozone and sample are set in a ratio of 10:1.
and other fossilfuel companies are urging the European Union to relax targets to boost climate-friendly “green” hydrogen, hoping to win greater support for projects to manufacture the fuel using natural gas. The European Commission is due to enshrine a final definition of low-carbon hydrogen by the end of 2024.
Overall, deaths from these so-called “modern” forms of pollution — pollution that’s associated with industrialization, the use of fossilfuels, and chemical exposure — have increased by more than 66 percent over the past two decades. I can tell you that the real number is definitely higher,” he said.
The atmospheric chemist had won a Nobel Prize in 1995 for demonstrating how humanity was destroying the ozone layer, just one of the many ways people had radically altered the planet, from urbanization to releasing greenhouse gases. It’s just about whether we should narrow down the Anthropocene definition to an epoch beginning in 1952.”
It’s very, very, very bad,” she says in ABC’s prime-time Earth Day special , letting out heavy sighs and listing jumbled statistics about deforestation and the hole in the ozone layer. When recycling started taking off in the early 1990s, there was no definitive, agreed-upon definition of what it meant. I recycle these.”
A business can then consider all the aspects of their business that produce carbon, including fossilfuels , land clearance and the production and consumption of food, manufactured goods, materials, wood, roads, buildings, transportation and other services. Your carbon footprint can then be managed once understood.
A company that uses fossilfuel-based energy shouldn't make this claim unless it buys renewable energy credits (RECs), the FTC says. Ozone-safe or ozone-friendly. The FTC considers these terms deceptive if a product has any substance, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), known to erode the ozone layer.
degrees Celsius warmer than the pre-industrial average, due to the vast amounts of heat-trapping carbon dioxide that humans have added to the atmosphere by burning fossilfuels. Adding sulfate aerosols to the stratosphere would degrade the ozone layer (thereby increasing global cancer rates) and increase acid rain.
While he’s on record that, as prime minister, he would eliminate the consumer-facing carbon price, more recently he expanded his “axe the tax” campaign to include other federal climate policies, including the clean fuel and clean electricity regulations. Other notable conservatives who have moved the agenda include George H.W.
Everyone was saying the right things, and to some extent doing the right things – passing legislation on water, on air, fixing the hole in the ozone layer. Talking about a Green New Deal, they’re saying that some sectors, specifically fossilfuels and adjacent industries need to degrow to nothing. Those things happened.
There has been a long-raging dispute in private investing circles over whether investing in fossilfuel energy is either wise from a societal viewpoint or profitable from a private one. Think: opioids, or ozone-depleting chemicals, or leaded-gasoline, or asbestos, or DDT. Which brings up the history of investing in energy.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content